Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Review of "The Sound of Music Live"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/tv/nbcs-the-sound-of-music-live-an-impossible-climb-after-all/2013/12/06/cb97f374-5c43-11e3-be07-006c776266ed_story.html


In Hank Stuever’s Washington Post review of “The sound of Music Live”, Stuever states that the live presentation was “an ambitious, yet disappointing stiff staging of the original musical” giving it a bad review.
                He argues three different reasons why he feels like this live presentation of “The Sound of Music” was the worst disaster he had seen on TV since “Nik Wallenda prayed with Joel Osteen and then tight roped across a Grand Canyon gorge”. First he talks about the lighting choices. In his review, Stuever referred to the lighting as strange and states that the lighting “was reminiscent of old soap operas that turned everything either a shade of scented candle or backyard compost”. Secondly, he argued that the true essence of the movie was not captured which for nearly everyone means the vivid and endlessly ebullient 1965 Robert Wise film, starring Julie Andrews and Christopher Plummer. Lastly, he mocked the acting of Carrie Underwood who played Maria the governess and said of her “it’s impossible not to notice that she can’t act. When Underwood spoke her lines, she was as flat as the label on a Swiss Miss package of cocoa”, and also mocked Stephen Moyer in the role of Captain von Trapp who struggled with a format that is all but alien to today’s TV.
                However, I do not think the review is a fair one especially when comparing it to the 1965 film, which if reviewed at today’s standards may have negative critic also and two, it is harder to stage a live show than act a film. Although one might say a classic movie like “The sound of Music” should not have been emulated if it wasn’t going to be done right, I believe that the producers ventured because of their love for the movie and I believed it showed throughout the production.
                The lighting that Stuever seemed to dislike was setting the mood of the production for it captured the era of the movie. The “shade of scented candle lighting” as Stuever puts it was deliberate to emphasize the time period and it allows the audience to travel back and appreciate the thought process put into the production. The essence of the movie that Stuever so lightly thought was not captured was very well brilliantly captured through the songs which were nicely done and which I’m sure the audience sang along to. The acting of Carrie Underwood and Stephen Moyer may not have been phenomenal, but were good enough to enjoy a live show which is not very easy to do. They portrayed characters that have been a favorite of most American families and would have been a tough act to follow even if portrayed by great actors like Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt.
                I think Stuever should have given the production better credit for their effort of creating America’s favorite pass time movie as a live production.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment